[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241215130313.781aebb7@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:03:13 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: ahaslam@...libre.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, robh@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: dac: ad5791: ldac gpio is active low
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:47:01 +0000
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 11:38:24AM +0100, ahaslam@...libre.com wrote:
> > From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
> >
> > On the example, the ldac gpio is flagged as active high, when in reality
> > its an active low gpio. Fix the example by using the active low flag for
> > the ldac gpio.
> >
> > Fixes: baaa92d284d5 ("dt-bindings: iio: dac: ad5791: Add optional reset, clr and ldac gpios")
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Applied thanks. I'd dropped the ball on this one, so only noticed when reviewing
the older stuff in patchwork for dependencies that had resolved.
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists