linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: samsung-galaxybook: Add samsung-galaxybook driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMF+KebEX+AM_6O5j=ym6GzZ64qac=Kknd1SKLx6VhJsZG-eiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 18:19:05 +0100
From: Joshua Grisham <josh@...huagrisham.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Joshua Grisham <josh@...huagrisham.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, 
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, hdegoede@...hat.com, 
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: samsung-galaxybook: Add samsung-galaxybook driver

Den sön 15 dec. 2024 kl 17:35 skrev Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>:
>
> Your v2 is highly unusual. The patch description is the change log,
> and the patch itself seems to be a diff against v1. Did someone ask you
> to do that ? Just wondering.
>
> Guenter
>

Hi Guenter, here I was just following a patch guide (or at least,
attempting to?); should it instead be a whole new patch against
for-next instead of a diff from the v1 of the first patch itself?

Thank you,
Joshua