[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <940e60d3-2617-4156-945e-01b1e345c27e@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 10:38:05 +0000
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Simon Trimmer
<simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Charles Keepax
<ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: avoid large local variables
On 16/12/2024 8:33 am, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Having 1280 bytes of local variables on the stack exceeds the limit
> on 32-bit architectures:
>
> drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c: In function 'bin_patch_mixed_packed_unpacked_random':
> drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c:2097:1: error: the frame size of 1784 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>
> Use dynamic allocation for the largest two here.
>
> Fixes: dd0b6b1f29b9 ("firmware: cs_dsp: Add KUnit testing of bin file download")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> .../firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c | 36 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c b/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c
> index 689190453307..f1955813919c 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c
> @@ -1978,8 +1978,10 @@ static void bin_patch_mixed_packed_unpacked_random(struct kunit *test)
> 4, 51, 76, 72, 16, 6, 39, 62, 15, 41, 28, 73, 53, 40, 45, 54,
> 14, 55, 46, 66, 64, 59, 23, 9, 67, 47, 19, 71, 35, 18, 42, 1,
> };
> - u32 packed_payload[80][3];
> - u32 unpacked_payload[80];
> + struct {
> + u32 packed[80][3];
> + u32 unpacked[80];
> + } *payload;
> u32 readback[3];
> unsigned int alg_base_words, patch_pos_words;
> unsigned int alg_base_in_packed_regs, patch_pos_in_packed_regs;
> @@ -1988,8 +1990,12 @@ static void bin_patch_mixed_packed_unpacked_random(struct kunit *test)
> struct firmware *fw;
> int i;
>
> - get_random_bytes(packed_payload, sizeof(packed_payload));
> - get_random_bytes(unpacked_payload, sizeof(unpacked_payload));
> + payload = kmalloc(sizeof(*payload), GFP_KERNEL);
Should be kunit_kmalloc() so the kunit framework frees it automatically
if any test case fails and the test terminates early.
Apart from that it looks ok to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists