[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec6881c2-10a9-4b4d-a53b-f882d6aa89d3@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:18:55 +0000
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Simon Trimmer
<simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Charles Keepax
<ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: avoid large local variables
On 16/12/2024 10:38 am, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 16/12/2024 8:33 am, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>
>> Having 1280 bytes of local variables on the stack exceeds the limit
>> on 32-bit architectures:
>>
>> drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c: In function
>> 'bin_patch_mixed_packed_unpacked_random':
>> drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c:2097:1: error: the
>> frame size of 1784 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-
>> larger-than=]
>>
>> Use dynamic allocation for the largest two here.
>>
>> Fixes: dd0b6b1f29b9 ("firmware: cs_dsp: Add KUnit testing of bin file
>> download")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>> .../firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c | 36 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c b/drivers/
>> firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c
>> index 689190453307..f1955813919c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/cirrus/test/cs_dsp_test_bin.c
>> @@ -1978,8 +1978,10 @@ static void
>> bin_patch_mixed_packed_unpacked_random(struct kunit *test)
>> 4, 51, 76, 72, 16, 6, 39, 62, 15, 41, 28, 73, 53, 40, 45, 54,
>> 14, 55, 46, 66, 64, 59, 23, 9, 67, 47, 19, 71, 35, 18, 42, 1,
>> };
>> - u32 packed_payload[80][3];
>> - u32 unpacked_payload[80];
>> + struct {
>> + u32 packed[80][3];
>> + u32 unpacked[80];
>> + } *payload;
>> u32 readback[3];
>> unsigned int alg_base_words, patch_pos_words;
>> unsigned int alg_base_in_packed_regs, patch_pos_in_packed_regs;
>> @@ -1988,8 +1990,12 @@ static void
>> bin_patch_mixed_packed_unpacked_random(struct kunit *test)
>> struct firmware *fw;
>> int i;
>> - get_random_bytes(packed_payload, sizeof(packed_payload));
>> - get_random_bytes(unpacked_payload, sizeof(unpacked_payload));
>> + payload = kmalloc(sizeof(*payload), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Should be kunit_kmalloc() so the kunit framework frees it automatically
> if any test case fails and the test terminates early.
>
> Apart from that it looks ok to me.
Also the check for NULL should use KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() so the test
case will error-out.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists