[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a345f7a1-52f0-476e-b2ca-7e229e957d46@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:59:16 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v021 7/9] PM: EM: Register perf domains with ho
:active_power() callbacks
On 29/11/2024 17:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
In Subject:
with ho :active_power() - without ?
^^^^^^^
[...]
> @@ -594,7 +599,19 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct d
> * All CPUs of a domain must have the same
> * micro-architecture since they all share the same
> * table.
> + *
> + * If the :active_power() callback is present, the
> + * performance values for different states in the table
> + * computed by em_create_perf_table() depend on the CPU
> + * capacity which therefore must be the same for all
> + * CPUs in the domain. However, if the :active_power()
> + * callback is not NULL, em_create_perf_table() doesn't
s/is not NULL/is NULL ?
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists