[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iwiQVRCpm3Z4HY2S_LANrjWgRSGaQVXFfw12dVBzKdGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:58:57 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v021 7/9] PM: EM: Register perf domains with ho
:active_power() callbacks
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:59 AM Dietmar Eggemann
<dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2024 17:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> In Subject:
>
> with ho :active_power() - without ?
> ^^^^^^^
Sure, thanks!
> [...]
>
> > @@ -594,7 +599,19 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct d
> > * All CPUs of a domain must have the same
> > * micro-architecture since they all share the same
> > * table.
> > + *
> > + * If the :active_power() callback is present, the
> > + * performance values for different states in the table
> > + * computed by em_create_perf_table() depend on the CPU
> > + * capacity which therefore must be the same for all
> > + * CPUs in the domain. However, if the :active_power()
> > + * callback is not NULL, em_create_perf_table() doesn't
>
> s/is not NULL/is NULL ?
>
> [...]
Yeah, one negation too many, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists