[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29d80fff-f33f-4470-a345-3f8f1a46f1af@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:40:31 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: jane.chu@...cle.com, yazen.ghannam@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, mingo@...hat.com, robin.murphy@....com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, bp@...en8.de, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
tanxiaofei@...wei.com, mawupeng1@...wei.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com, james.morse@....com,
tongtiangen@...wei.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, will@...nel.org,
jarkko@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, justin.he@....com,
ardb@...nel.org, ying.huang@...el.com, ashish.kalra@....com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
robert.moore@...el.com, lvying6@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/3] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if
synchronous memory error not recovered
在 2024/12/17 07:37, jane.chu@...cle.com 写道:
>
> On 12/1/2024 7:05 PM, Shuai Xue wrote:
>> Synchronous error was detected as a result of user-space process accessing
>> a 2-bit uncorrected error. The CPU will take a synchronous error exception
>> such as Synchronous External Abort (SEA) on Arm64. The kernel will queue a
>> memory_failure() work which poisons the related page, unmaps the page, and
>> then sends a SIGBUS to the process, so that a system wide panic can be
>> avoided.
>>
>> However, no memory_failure() work will be queued when abnormal synchronous
>> errors occur. These errors can include situations such as invalid PA,
>> unexpected severity, no memory failure config support, invalid GUID
>> section, etc. In such case, the user-space process will trigger SEA again.
>> This loop can potentially exceed the platform firmware threshold or even
>> trigger a kernel hard lockup, leading to a system reboot.
>>
>> Fix it by performing a force kill if no memory_failure() work is queued
>> for synchronous errors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index a2491905f165..106486bdfefc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -801,6 +801,17 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>> }
>> }
>> + /*
>> + * If no memory failure work is queued for abnormal synchronous
>> + * errors, do a force kill.
>> + */
>> + if (sync && !queued) {
>> + dev_err(ghes->dev,
>> + HW_ERR GHES_PFX "%s:%d: synchronous unrecoverable error (SIGBUS)\n",
>> + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
>> + force_sig(SIGBUS);
>> + }
>> +
>> return queued;
>> }
>
> Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
>
> -jane
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Shuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists