linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] media: dt-bindings: update clocks for sc7280-camss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c14493b0-c9d3-4e1c-9f86-991b4cb25c98@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:12:34 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>, rfoss@...nel.org,
 todor.too@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, akapatra@...cinc.com,
 hariramp@...cinc.com, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
 hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
 catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] media: dt-bindings: update clocks for
 sc7280-camss

On 17/12/2024 14:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/12/2024 15:06, Vikram Sharma wrote:
>> This patch change clock names to make it consistent with
>> existing platforms as gcc_cam_hf_axi -> gcc_axi_hf.
>> This also adds gcc_axi_sf and remove gcc_camera_ahb.
> 
> Don't combine ABI changes with some less important things.
> 
> You miss here explanation why doing the ABI change in the first place.
> Without that explanation I find it rather churn. But anyway, reason for
> ABI break and impact should be documented in commit msg.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

This change should be fine since we haven't committed and upstream dtsi, 
so there's no ABI to break yet.

Agree the cover letter should have been explicit in explaining.

---
bod