[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTAJQJ1zh0EZY6aj2Pv=eMWJgTHm20sh_j9Z4NkX_ga=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:59:51 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, kernel-team@...a.com, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] ima: evm: Add kernel cmdline options to disable IMA/EVM
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 4:29 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2024 12:25 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > While reading and testing LSM code, I found IMA/EVM consume per inode
> > storage even when they are not in use. Add options to diable them in
> > kernel command line. The logic and syntax is mostly borrowed from an
> > old serious [1].
>
> Why not omit ima and evm from the lsm= parameter?
Exactly. Here is a link to the kernel documentation if anyone is
interested (search for "lsm"):
https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.html
It is worth mentioning that this works for all the LSMs.
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1398259638.git.d.kasatkin@samsung.com/
> >
> > Song Liu (2):
> > ima: Add kernel parameter to disable IMA
> > evm: Add kernel parameter to disable EVM
> >
> > security/integrity/evm/evm.h | 6 ++++++
> > security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> > security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 3 ++-
> > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.5
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists