lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241217-arm64-fix-boot-cpu-smidr-v3-1-7be278a85623@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 21:59:48 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
 Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] arm64/sme: Move storage of reg_smidr to
 __cpuinfo_store_cpu()

In commit 892f7237b3ff ("arm64: Delay initialisation of
cpuinfo_arm64::reg_{zcr,smcr}") we moved access to ZCR, SMCR and SMIDR
later in the boot process in order to ensure that we don't attempt to
interact with them if SVE or SME is disabled on the command line.
Unfortunately when initialising the boot CPU in init_cpu_features() we work
on a copy of the struct cpuinfo_arm64 for the boot CPU used only during
boot, not the percpu copy used by the sysfs code. The expectation of the
feature identification code was that the ID registers would be read in
__cpuinfo_store_cpu() and the values not modified by init_cpu_features().

The main reason for the original change was to avoid early accesses to
ZCR on practical systems that were seen shipping with SVE reported in ID
registers but traps enabled at EL3 and handled as fatal errors, SME was
rolled in due to the similarity with SVE. Since then we have removed the
early accesses to ZCR and SMCR in commits:

  abef0695f9665c3d ("arm64/sve: Remove ZCR pseudo register from cpufeature code")
  391208485c3ad50f ("arm64/sve: Remove SMCR pseudo register from cpufeature code")

so only the SMIDR_EL1 part of the change remains. Since SMIDR_EL1 is
only trapped via FEAT_IDST and not the SME trap it is less likely to be
affected by similar issues, and the factors that lead to issues with SVE
are less likely to apply to SME.

Since we have not yet seen practical SME systems that need to use a
command line override (and are only just beginning to see SME systems at
all) and the ID register read is much more likely to be safe let's just
store SMIDR_EL1 along with all the other ID register reads in
__cpuinfo_store_cpu().

This issue wasn't apparent when testing on emulated platforms that do not
report values in SMIDR_EL1.

Fixes: 892f7237b3ff ("arm64: Delay initialisation of cpuinfo_arm64::reg_{zcr,smcr}")
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
Changes in v3:
- Leave the override in place.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216-arm64-fix-boot-cpu-smidr-v2-1-a99ffba2c37f@kernel.org

Changes in v2:
- Move the ID register read back to __cpuinfo_store_cpu().
- Remove the command line option for SME ID register override.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241214-arm64-fix-boot-cpu-smidr-v1-1-0745c40772dd@kernel.org
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 13 -------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c    | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 6ce71f444ed84f9056196bb21bbfac61c9687e30..818aca922ca6066eb4bdf79e153cccb24246c61b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1167,12 +1167,6 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 	    id_aa64pfr1_sme(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1))) {
 		unsigned long cpacr = cpacr_save_enable_kernel_sme();
 
-		/*
-		 * We mask out SMPS since even if the hardware
-		 * supports priorities the kernel does not at present
-		 * and we block access to them.
-		 */
-		info->reg_smidr = read_cpuid(SMIDR_EL1) & ~SMIDR_EL1_SMPS;
 		vec_init_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SME);
 
 		cpacr_restore(cpacr);
@@ -1423,13 +1417,6 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 	    id_aa64pfr1_sme(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1))) {
 		unsigned long cpacr = cpacr_save_enable_kernel_sme();
 
-		/*
-		 * We mask out SMPS since even if the hardware
-		 * supports priorities the kernel does not at present
-		 * and we block access to them.
-		 */
-		info->reg_smidr = read_cpuid(SMIDR_EL1) & ~SMIDR_EL1_SMPS;
-
 		/* Probe vector lengths */
 		if (!system_capabilities_finalized())
 			vec_update_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SME);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index d79e88fccdfce427507e7a34c5959ce6309cbd12..c45633b5ae233fe78607fce3d623efb28a9f341a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -482,6 +482,16 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 	if (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
 		info->reg_mpamidr = read_cpuid(MPAMIDR_EL1);
 
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) &&
+	    id_aa64pfr1_sme(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1)) {
+		/*
+		 * We mask out SMPS since even if the hardware
+		 * supports priorities the kernel does not at present
+		 * and we block access to them.
+		 */
+		info->reg_smidr = read_cpuid(SMIDR_EL1) & ~SMIDR_EL1_SMPS;
+	}
+
 	cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(info);
 }
 

---
base-commit: fac04efc5c793dccbd07e2d59af9f90b7fc0dca4
change-id: 20241213-arm64-fix-boot-cpu-smidr-386b8db292b2

Best regards,
-- 
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ