linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [block] e70c301fae: stress-ng.aiol.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241217045527.GA16091@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 05:55:28 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [block]  e70c301fae: stress-ng.aiol.ops_per_sec
 49.6% regression

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:51:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > kernel test robot noticed a 49.6% regression of stress-ng.aiol.ops_per_sec on:
> 
> This sounds like there is some other I/O path that still reorders,
> which got messed up.  What storage driver is this using?  The repro
> material talks about an ata disk, but I'm still curious if it's ahci
> or some other driver, or a SAS HBA?

Do you have the information on what hardware is used for this test?