linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [block] e70c301fae: stress-ng.aiol.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241213143224.GA16111@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:32:24 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [block]  e70c301fae: stress-ng.aiol.ops_per_sec
 49.6% regression

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:51:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed a 49.6% regression of stress-ng.aiol.ops_per_sec on:

This sounds like there is some other I/O path that still reorders,
which got messed up.  What storage driver is this using?  The repro
material talks about an ata disk, but I'm still curious if it's ahci
or some other driver, or a SAS HBA?