[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgdFnwBD9odfSBz2zjedw1oWKKO3F46YAC_puE4b9J6JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:02:34 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ring-buffer: Add uname to match criteria for
persistent ring buffer
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 15:32, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> But if you look more closely, you'll see that the way the buffer is
> managed is actually not as a word array at all, but using
>
> char *str, *end;
>
> instead of word pointers.
Oh, and in addition to the smaller-than-int types ('%c' and '%hd'
etc), pointers that get dereferenced also get written as a byte string
to that word array. There might be other cases too.
So it's really a fairly odd kind of "sometimes words, sometimes not"
array, with the size of the array given in words.
That binary printf is very strange.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists