[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nvhrhnfls2i4sb6rrlax2dh3hf5thfttrq54bgug2jc7ol26rj@cnk5dtampfes>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:27:31 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@....qualcomm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Disable USB U1/U2 entry for QC targets
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:56:48PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
> Enabling U1 and U2 power-saving states can lead to stability and
> performance issues, particularly for latency-sensitive or high-
> throughput applications. These low-power link states are intended
> to reduce power consumption by allowing the device to enter partial
> low-power modes during idle periods. However, they can sometimes
> result in unexpected behavior. Over the years, some of the issues
> seen are as follows:
>
[..]
>
> This series was earlier started by Krishna Kurapati where he disabled
> U1/U2 on some SM targets. I'm extending this to more devices including
> Auto, Compute and IOT platforms. On a side note, this quirk has been
> already included on some mobile targets like SM8550/8650.
Why are you resending previous patches rather than adding another series
on top of it?
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed the wrongly added quirks from tcsr_mutex node.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241213095237.1409174-1-quic_prashk@quicinc.com/
What was changed in v3?
>
> Link to RFC:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241107073650.13473-1-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8250.dtsi
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists