[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=2tbRJ6Chq02iGwpNToe4zHR-RtXq+Qv_bFzyvdyXHsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 01:57:29 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Jimmy Ostler <jtostler1@...il.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>, Filipe Xavier <felipe_life@...e.com>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>, Daniel Sedlak <daniel@...lak.dev>,
Alex Mantel <alexmantel93@...lbox.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: error: Change `LayoutError` to internal
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 1:24 AM Jimmy Ostler <jtostler1@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add an implementation of `From<LayoutError> for Error` for the
> `kernel::alloc::layout::LayoutError`.
> Remove the implementation on `core::alloc::LayoutError`, because we
> don't use it anywhere.
No need to send a new version for this, but it may make sense to
reword to clarify that this switches the import, and therefore the
`impl` switches from one to the other. The way it is written, it
sounds like an actual `impl` item was textually added and another one
removed.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists