[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z2LDa6cHRYdp__53@pollux>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:43:23 +0100
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Jimmy Ostler <jtostler1@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>,
Filipe Xavier <felipe_life@...e.com>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>,
Daniel Sedlak <daniel@...lak.dev>,
Alex Mantel <alexmantel93@...lbox.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: error: Change `LayoutError` to internal
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 01:57:29AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 1:24 AM Jimmy Ostler <jtostler1@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add an implementation of `From<LayoutError> for Error` for the
> > `kernel::alloc::layout::LayoutError`.
> > Remove the implementation on `core::alloc::LayoutError`, because we
> > don't use it anywhere.
>
> No need to send a new version for this, but it may make sense to
> reword to clarify that this switches the import, and therefore the
> `impl` switches from one to the other. The way it is written, it
> sounds like an actual `impl` item was textually added and another one
> removed.
Agree with Miguel, the commit message is slightly misleading.
With that fixed,
Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists