[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1bQ=RGKgv42nBkQFB+GXS6603BQr-E1ZbSBc3J044MnsDr3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 09:19:54 -0800
From: Rong Xu <xur@...gle.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>,
Han Shen <shenhan@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] AutoFDO: Remove the architecture specific config
Thanks for the Acked-by.
Regarding the ETM documentation change, I haven't forgotten it. I
think it's best for Yabin to submit another patch (or revision of his
previous patch), as he has done all the ETM side work.
Best regards,
-Rong
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:52 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 02:29:42PM -0800, Rong Xu wrote:
> > The CONFIG_AUTOFDO_CLANG option currently depends on
> > ARCH_SUPPORTS_AUTOFDO_CLANG, but this dependency seems unnecessary.
> >
> > Remove ARCH_SUPPORTS_AUTOFDO_CLANG and allow users to control AutoFDO
> > builds solely through CONFIG_AUTOFDO_CLANG. This simplifies the kconfig
> > and avoids potential confusion.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rong Xu <xur@...gle.com>
> > Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/Kconfig | 4 ----
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>
> However, you've dropped the previous hunk you had to
> Documentation/dev-tools/autofdo.rst which had some text about using ETM
> to collect fdo data on arm64. It seems like that might still be useful
> to have?
>
> Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists