[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69503b23-12da-4270-9910-9440dba7df07@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:46:12 +0530
From: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli
<quic_narepall@...cinc.com>,
Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] scsi: ufs: qcom: Enable UFS Shared ICE Feature
On 18-Dec-24 10:49 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/18/24 7:11 AM, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> +static void ufs_qcom_config_ice_allocator(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
>> +{
>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = host->hba;
>> + uint8_t val[4] = { NUM_RX_R1W0, NUM_TX_R0W1, NUM_RX_R1W1, NUM_TX_R1W1 };
>
> This array can be declared 'static const', isn't it?
Hi Bart,
As this value is not modified in this function, we will declare it as const in next patchset
>
>> + u32 config;
>> +
>> + if (!is_ice_config_supported(host))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + config = val[0] | (val[1] << 8) | (val[2] << 16) | (val[3] << 24);
>
> Isn't this is an open-coded version of get_unaligned_le32()?
sure will make the suggested change in next patchset
Thanks,
Ram.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists