[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ca3129-245f-481f-9ca1-ed9d8db6e990@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 13:39:30 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
chang hao <ot_chhao.chang@...iatek.com>
Cc: matthias.bgg@...il.com, sean.wang@...nel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v1 pinctrl: mtk-eint: add eint new design for mt8196
Il 17/12/24 14:45, Linus Walleij ha scritto:
> Hi Chang,
>
> thanks for your patch!
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 2:13 PM chang hao <ot_chhao.chang@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Chhao Chang <ot_chhao.chang@...iatek.com>
>>
>> Change 1: change EINT from 1 address to 5 addresses,
>> Eint number is stored on each base.
>> Change 2: Compatible with 1 address design
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chhao Chang <ot_chhao.chang@...iatek.com>
>
> This patch looks good to me, as preparation for mt8196,
> but can one of the Mediatek experts please
> review it? If nothing happens I will just apply it I guess...
>
Linus, that's something like the fourth time that he pushes variations of this
patch which do break all MediaTek SoCs in a way or another, leaving only MT8196
hopefully-functional.
NACK.
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists