[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1157a6c9-0039-4077-9161-91aea6ab4213@web.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 17:56:05 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] tracing: Switch trace_events_trigger.c code over to
use guard()
…
> Switch every location that ends with unlocking a mutex on error over to
> using the guard(mutex)() infrastructure to let the compiler worry about
> releasing locks. This makes the code easier to read and understand.
>
> Also use __free() for free a temporary buffer in event_trigger_regex_write().
Can it be safer and cleaner to split adjustments for these programming interfaces?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.13-rc3#n81
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists