lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72d98029-6daa-4eeb-b1c9-10e8183adb74@web.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 17:33:12 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] tracing: Switch trace.c code over to use guard()

…
> Switch every location that ends with unlocking a mutex or freeing on error
> over to using the guard(mutex)() and __free() infrastructure to let the
> compiler worry about releasing locks. …

Can it be safer and cleaner to split adjustments for these programming interfaces?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.13-rc3#n81

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ