[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62c599b5-20b2-4e1e-810d-e4502abbc682@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:47:20 -0800
From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>,
ath12k@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: net: wireless: Describe ath12k
PCI module with WSI
On 12/20/2024 12:03 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.11.2024 7:04 PM, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>> The QCN9274 WiFi device supports WSI (WLAN Serial Interface). WSI is used
>> to exchange specific control information across radios using a doorbell
>> mechanism. This WSI connection is essential for exchanging control
>> information among these devices. The WSI interface in the QCN9274 includes
>> TX and RX ports, which are used to connect multiple WSI-supported devices
>> together, forming a WSI group.
>>
>> Describe QCN9274 PCI wifi device with WSI interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>
> I think this description is missing the key points:
>
> * what is that control information (power, data, radio stuff?)
> * what happens when the OS is unaware of all of this (i.e. what happens when
> we don't send any configuration)
> * is this configurable, or does this describe a physical wiring topology
> (what/who decides which of the group configurations detailed below take
> effect)
>
> And the ultimate question:
> * can the devices not just talk among themselves and negotiate that?
>
> Though AFAICU PCIe P2P communication is a shaky topic, so perhaps the answer
> to the last question is 'no'
>
> Konrad
We already pushed the non-RFC version to our -next tree so we cannot update
the commit description without a forced push.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241211153432.775335-2-kvalo@kernel.org/
However, Raj Kumar can submit an update to the description in the file, which
is probably the better place to have this information anyway.
/jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists