[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <768ef22a-855b-472d-9432-49db7daaf2df@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 23:05:03 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>,
ath12k@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: net: wireless: Describe ath12k
PCI module with WSI
On 20.12.2024 10:47 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 12/20/2024 12:03 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 5.11.2024 7:04 PM, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>>> The QCN9274 WiFi device supports WSI (WLAN Serial Interface). WSI is used
>>> to exchange specific control information across radios using a doorbell
>>> mechanism. This WSI connection is essential for exchanging control
>>> information among these devices. The WSI interface in the QCN9274 includes
>>> TX and RX ports, which are used to connect multiple WSI-supported devices
>>> together, forming a WSI group.
>>>
>>> Describe QCN9274 PCI wifi device with WSI interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> I think this description is missing the key points:
>>
>> * what is that control information (power, data, radio stuff?)
>> * what happens when the OS is unaware of all of this (i.e. what happens when
>> we don't send any configuration)
>> * is this configurable, or does this describe a physical wiring topology
>> (what/who decides which of the group configurations detailed below take
>> effect)
>>
>> And the ultimate question:
>> * can the devices not just talk among themselves and negotiate that?
>>
>> Though AFAICU PCIe P2P communication is a shaky topic, so perhaps the answer
>> to the last question is 'no'
>>
>> Konrad
>
> We already pushed the non-RFC version to our -next tree so we cannot update
> the commit description without a forced push.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241211153432.775335-2-kvalo@kernel.org/
>
> However, Raj Kumar can submit an update to the description in the file, which
> is probably the better place to have this information anyway.
Sounds good
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists