[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241220123551.696330-1-laurentiu.palcu@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:35:47 +0200
From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@....nxp.com>
To: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@....nxp.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] staging: media: max96712: a few, mainly cosmetic, changes
This is just a resend after fixing my .gitconfig issue with the mail
Content-Type header. While at it, collect the r-b tag for 2/3.
Hi,
This is in preparation for bringing our downstream max96724 work into
the max96712 driver. The changes in this patch-set are mainly cosmetic
to increase readability, with one exception related to the PCLK debug
register which appears to exist in MAX96724 as well(see VPG section in
users guide [1]).
Unfortunately, I couldn't find any max96712 reference manual anywhere to
make sure the registers match between the 2 chips, nor I have a max96712
to test with.
However, since the max96724 compatible was added here, according to the
commit
6c872b782ae ("media: staging: max96712: Add support for MAX96724")
the chips are "almost identical". So, I used max96724 register and
field descriptions instead. Someone with a max96712 RM may want to
double-check though.
Thanks,
Laurentiu
[1] https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/user-guides/max96724fr-user-guide.pdf
Laurentiu Palcu (3):
staging: media: max96712: fix typo
staging: media: max96712: remove extra debug register flag
staging: media: max96712: add some register and field definitions
drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c | 213 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 164 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists