[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yg7b2iaz53avd7gpvuewhi6b3myh6owls3dt2hzpqc26lnykjf@tpu2vxqqkipe>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:13:42 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>, Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>,
Xavier Chang <xavier.chang@...iatek.com>, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek: Add MT8196
support for gce-mailbox
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 01:07:54AM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> 2) GCE Subsys ID:
> - Defined in the header file: `#define SUBSYS_1c00XXXX 3`
> - Used in the Device Tree:
> `mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce SUBSYS_1c00XXXX 0x0000 0x1000>;`
> - Parsed and used in the driver to configure subsys ID:
> ```c
> int cmdq_dev_get_client_reg(struct device *dev,
> struct cmdq_client_reg *client_reg,
> int idx)
> {
> client_reg->subsys = (u8)spec.args[0];
> client_reg->offset = (u16)spec.args[1];
> }
> // GCE write the value to the register 0x1c000000 + 0x0000 + offset
> cmdq_pkt_write(cmdq_handle, client_reg->subsys,
> client_reg->offset + offset, value);
This is a proof that SUBSYS_1300XXXX is not a binding. Your driver does
not use it.
Drop all such things which are not used by drivers or explain why they
are needed to be in the binding - what do they bind.
I asked for this already, for exactly the same thing.
I did not check the rest, so next time I will choose any other random
define and if I do not find it explained nor used, I will question it.
Because you tend to apply pieces of review instead of really change your
code.
> ```
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists