[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jjz7dk3rr3sruyks6yduwo37fcxqcut3vuqax2m43nvipnqdsu@zxzbddrlzk6j>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:31:17 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, heiko@...ech.de,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add
rockchip,rk3562-pwm
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:42:30AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:49:14PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> > Add rockchip,rk3562-pwm compatible string.
>
> This we see from the diff. Say something not obvious. Where is the
> driver change? Why devices are or are not compatible?
There is no driver change necessary because the newly supported
compatible is
compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm";
Indeed this could be made more obvious in the commit log, something
like:
The PWM core on Rockchip's RK3562 is the same as the one already
included in RK3328. Extend the binding accordingly to allow
compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm";
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists