[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ghgvphxopt4wvwtauahbnte3jzivyof3nujylx3b2utxi25iql@7sc2d3pb2fv4>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 23:05:58 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>, Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] i2c: riic: Implement bus recovery
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 12:27:38PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I'd like to merge this once all the hardware questions are
> > answered.
>
> Maybe we can apply patches 1-8 already, so they don't reappear on the
> list? IMHO they make sense independently of the bus recovery patch.
yes, this is what I already suggested as well in 0/8. Indeed
Prabhakar sent already patch 1-8 that I just checked and applied
(locally, still).
Thanks for your reviews and test here and thanks Prabhakar for
following on the reviews.
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists