[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a0e9d97-26f2-45b1-a783-fabcbb9e1c05@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:45:44 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@...iconsignals.io>
Cc: "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Emil Gedenryd <emil.gedenryd@...s.com>,
Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@...com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: iio: light: opt3001: add compatible for
opt3004
On 28/12/2024 11:54, Hardevsinh Palaniya wrote:
>>> - Reverse the order of compatible string
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>
>>> - Use fallback mechanism for the OPT3004.
>>> - Drop 2/2 patch from the patch series[1] as per feedback.
>>>
>>> Link[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20241224061321.6048-1-hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io/T/#t
>>
>>
>> And where is any user of this, the DTS? We don't take bindings just
>> because there is such device out there.
>>
>> I looked and nothing:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=ti%2Copt3004
>
> I added compatibility for the OPT3004 into the driver. However,
> based on Andy's feedback, it seems there might not be a need
> to include this directly in the driver.
> (Refer to Link [1] from the changelog.)
>
> we could follow a similar approach to how we handled the ADXL346,
> by just adding it to the bindings, since the ADXL346 is similar to the
> ADXL345.
Sure, I am not talking about this. I am looking for a user of the
binding. Where is one?
User is any piece of *upstream* project which uses the binding.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists