linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add NetCube Systems Austria name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c025818214942560a291f8c53108503a@netcube.li>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:24:04 +0100
From: Lukas Schmid <lukas.schmid@...cube.li>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej
 Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add NetCube Systems
 Austria name

Am 2025-01-02 18:57, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 02/01/2025 18:49, Lukas Schmid wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmid <lukas.schmid@...cube.li>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
> 
> You did not read really the messages we gave you...
> 
> 1. Read what I wrote in my first reply for v1. I gave detailed
> instruction to avoid the exact mistake you now did.
> 
> 2. Read again Andre's reply.
> 
> 3. Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads
> (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and
> might interfere with applying entire sets.
> 
> 4. Next version, with proper cover letter, is after 24h, so you have
> some time to digest the feedback.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi,

Thank you for your feedback, and I sincerely apologize for the mistakes 
in my submission process.

I did read Andre's reply and your feedback on v1, but unfortunately, I 
had already sent the v2 series as a reply before fully understanding all 
the recommendations. I realize now that this was a misstep and caused 
confusion.

I will wait until tomorrow, around 20:00, to send the v3 series. I will 
make sure to include a proper cover letter and ensure that all the 
feedback from v1 and v2 is addressed.

Regarding the v1 feedback, I thought I had incorporated all your 
suggestions. However, after rereading it, I seem to have missed 
something critical. Could you please point out what I might have 
overlooked? I want to make sure I fully understand and correct it in the 
next iteration.

Thank you for your patience and for helping me improve my submission 
process.

Best regards,
Lukas Schmid