linux-kernel - Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] arm64: dts: marvell: Fix anyOf conditional failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F92E6B5E-CB0A-429E-821F-FC87C3C69C29@public-files.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:55:11 +0100
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: linux@...web.de, dlemoal@...nel.org, cassel@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
 sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, hdegoede@...hat.com,
 axboe@...nel.dk, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] arm64: dts: marvell: Fix anyOf conditional failed

Am 2. Januar 2025 20:46:05 MEZ schrieb Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>:
>On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 12:44 PM Frank Wunderlich
><frank-w@...lic-files.de> wrote:
>>
>> is there any new state here? got no answer for my last 2 Messages
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20241109094623.37518-2-linux@fw-web.de/
>>
>> sorry for the html-entities...they came from my gmx webmailer, it is reported multiple times, but i cannot do more here :(
>
>As a maintainer, when I see any discussion or comments, I drop the
>patch from my queue. That may have happened here. It is best to resend
>if it's been more than 2 weeks. Though Marvell maintainer response
>times are often longer than that sadly.
>
>You haven't addressed my comment either. The subject needs work. If
>you don't like my suggestion, then come up with your own.

I have addressed your comment:

>> Here and the subject, "fixing anyOf" isn't very specific and is just an
>> implementation detail of the schema. "Add missing required 'phys'
>> property" would be more exact.
> imho it does not match what patch does...i do not add required phys...i just disable the nodes and enable them only where phys is set.

But maybe i can name it better.

Maybe something like this:

"Fix binding error caused by incomplete nodes."

>Rob


regards Frank