[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250104102821.GAZ3kNRWbxFGY-q56N@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 11:28:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>
Cc: thomas.lendacky@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, pgonda@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 09/13] tsc: Use the GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR for
discovering TSC frequency
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 07:29:10PM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> That was my understanding and implementation in v11, where Sean suggested that
> VMs running on CPUs supporting stable and always running TSC, should switch over
> to TSC properly[1] and [2], in a generic way.
Sure, you can do that. But that doesn't get rid of the fact that until the HV
is safely blocked from touching the TSC MSRs, you cannot trust it fully. IOW, only
Secure TSC can give you that, I don't know what provisions TDX has about that.
And then, even if you can get the HV out of the picture, the underlying hw is
not guaranteed either. That's why I keep returning to TSC watchdog disable
logic in check_system_tsc_reliable() - only then you can somewhat trust the
TSC hardware.
> That is not right, if non-secure guest is booted with TscInvariant bit set,
> guest will start using TSC as the clocksource, unfortunately sched clock
> keeps on using kvm-clock :(
Again: you can switch to the TSC as much as you want to but until the
hypervisor is out of the picture, you can't really trust it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists