[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250104194158.06449a3e@akair>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:41:58 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aaro Koskinen
<aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Tony
Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: omap4: panda: cleanup bluetooth
Hello Roger,
Am Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:29:44 +0200
schrieb Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> On 30/12/2024 01:01, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Bluetooth is available on the other Panda board versions, too, so move
> > stuff to common and specify the needed clock properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> > ---
> > .../boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi | 30 +++++++++++++++--
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-es.dts | 32 -------------------
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
> > index c860b590142a..c048ab9af053 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
> > @@ -368,9 +368,7 @@ OMAP4_IOPAD(0x130, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* i2c4_sda */
> > wl12xx_gpio: wl12xx-gpio-pins {
> > pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > OMAP4_IOPAD(0x066, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a19.gpio_43 */
>
> We could add function name in comment? e.g. /* gpmc_a19.gpio_43 - WLAN_EN */
>
This is about existing code, there is still a lot of room to cleanup
other stuff.
> > - OMAP4_IOPAD(0x06c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a22.gpio_46 */
> > OMAP4_IOPAD(0x070, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a24.gpio_48 */
>
> This one is FM_EN and has nothing to do with WLAN.
>
same here.
> > - OMAP4_IOPAD(0x072, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a25.gpio_49 */
> > >;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -393,6 +391,22 @@ button_pins: button-pins {
> > OMAP4_IOPAD(0x114, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpio_121 */
> > >;
> > };
> > +
> > + bt_pins: bt-pins {
> > + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > + OMAP4_IOPAD(0x06c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* BTEN */
> > + OMAP4_IOPAD(0x072, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* BTWAKEUP */
>
> Could we please use comment style <pin name>.<pinmux name> - Function
> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x06c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a22.gpio_46 - BTEN */
> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x072, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a25.gpio_49 - BTWAKEUP */
>
I was a bit lazy with checkpatch.pl. Your proposal generates a lot of
noise there, so I was too lazy to filter that noise, so I disabled that
noise. I had it first that way.
Regards,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists