[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e2312b8-78d2-4dec-9911-8fd513eeef25@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:33:55 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: omap4: panda: cleanup bluetooth
On 04/01/2025 20:41, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Hello Roger,
>
> Am Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:29:44 +0200
> schrieb Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>:
>
>> Hello Andreas,
>>
>> On 30/12/2024 01:01, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
>>> Bluetooth is available on the other Panda board versions, too, so move
>>> stuff to common and specify the needed clock properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
>>> ---
>>> .../boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi | 30 +++++++++++++++--
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-es.dts | 32 -------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
>>> index c860b590142a..c048ab9af053 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
>>> @@ -368,9 +368,7 @@ OMAP4_IOPAD(0x130, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* i2c4_sda */
>>> wl12xx_gpio: wl12xx-gpio-pins {
>>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>>> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x066, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a19.gpio_43 */
>>
>> We could add function name in comment? e.g. /* gpmc_a19.gpio_43 - WLAN_EN */
>>
> This is about existing code, there is still a lot of room to cleanup
> other stuff.
>
>>> - OMAP4_IOPAD(0x06c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a22.gpio_46 */
>>> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x070, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a24.gpio_48 */
>>
>> This one is FM_EN and has nothing to do with WLAN.
>>
> same here.
>>> - OMAP4_IOPAD(0x072, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a25.gpio_49 */
>>> >;
>>> };
>>>
>>> @@ -393,6 +391,22 @@ button_pins: button-pins {
>>> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x114, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpio_121 */
>>> >;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + bt_pins: bt-pins {
>>> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
>>> + OMAP4_IOPAD(0x06c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* BTEN */
>>> + OMAP4_IOPAD(0x072, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* BTWAKEUP */
>>
>> Could we please use comment style <pin name>.<pinmux name> - Function
>> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x06c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a22.gpio_46 - BTEN */
>> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x072, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3) /* gpmc_a25.gpio_49 - BTWAKEUP */
>>
> I was a bit lazy with checkpatch.pl. Your proposal generates a lot of
> noise there, so I was too lazy to filter that noise, so I disabled that
> noise. I had it first that way.
What noise? line length exceeded warnings? Those are harmless.
I'd prefer not to loose the pinmux/function information in the comment.
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists