linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] clk: qcom: gdsc: Release pm subdomains in reverse add order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c911b6e6-0af2-48f2-9445-0a05dcb1ab5e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 16:55:18 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
 Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] clk: qcom: gdsc: Release pm subdomains in reverse
 add order

On 06/01/2025 16:53, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> This sounds very reasonable to me, but what's the actual reason?
> 
>> Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support")
>> Cc:stable@...r.kernel.org
> Without a reason it's hard to see why this needs to be backported.
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn

The reason is it makes the next patch much cleaner and makes backporting 
the Fixes in the next patch cleaner too.

I could squash the two patches together as another option..