linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: per-process heatmaps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJj2-QEtASHEfiYuoKrfx7n1UjDS1e+aF0LdYB5vhBUUS3cq8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:19:03 -0800
From: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
To: Muyang Tian <tianmuyang@...wei.com>
Cc: Michael@...haellarabel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	yuzhao@...gle.com, yanan@...wei.com, xiesongyang@...wei.com, 
	wuchangye@...wei.com, liuxin350@...wei.com, zhangmingyi5@...wei.com, 
	liwei883@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: per-process heatmaps

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 7:15 PM Muyang Tian <tianmuyang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> It has been a long time since this patchset[0] submitted, and I've been doing something similar recently.
> I wonder why this patchset remains unmerged/uncommented? Is there any other similar work?
Hi Muyang,

I'd love to learn about your use case and your approach as well. The
code here requires some polish and cleanup, but it's mostly bpf code
in tooling. Happy to work on it.

Thanks,
Yuanchu