[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53g3kssqc4jdz77iiwxvy6fbwha2ukrjh7s7u3upltmpjtp2y6@2gcbhg7n5kle>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:21:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: reset: st,stm32-rcc: update reference
due to rename
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 07:14:14PM +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> With the conversion of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt
> to JSON schema, the reference to st,stm32-rcc.txt is now broken. Therefore,
So you introduce broken code to fix it in next patch?
> let's fix it.
Please stop splitting patches in some weird, either non-bisectable
or artificial way. How this can be a separate patch?
It's the second patchset recently doing such incorrect splits.
Please read submitting patches how to organize your patchset.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists