lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250106072116.GD16723@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:21:16 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
	oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-aio@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [block]  e70c301fae: stress-ng.aiol.ops_per_sec
 49.6% regression

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 10:09:14AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> One thing that came to mind.
> Some distros (e.g. Fedora and openSUSE) ship with an udev rule that sets
> the I/O scheduler to BFQ for single-queue HDDs.
> 
> It could very well be the I/O scheduler that reorders.
> 
> Oliver, which I/O scheduler are you using?
> $ cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler 
> none mq-deadline kyber [bfq]

I tried cfq as well and there is no reordering with our without various
file systems in the mix.  I've also tried forcing the rotational
attribute on and off just for an extra variation.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ