linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eec9caa0-0029-4774-842e-af1d1290ad97@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:08:09 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
	Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr()

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 12:32:39AM +0100, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
> Prevent the use of macros, and rely instead on kernel configuration for
> power management.
> 
> This series makes the same change over six different drivers:
> usb-st-dwc3, sdhci-st, st-spi-fsm, ahci_st, sti-dwmac, spi-st.

Is there any actual interaction between these changes?  In general you
shouldn't combine patches for multiple subsystems into a single series
unless there's some dependency or other interaction since it just
complicates management of the patches.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)