linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] netfilter: x_tables: Merge xt_*.h and ipt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b90ca20-6671-4878-8cfe-251613c64194@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 14:48:54 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Szőke Benjamin <egyszeregy@...email.hu>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, lorenzo@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net, leitao@...ian.org, amiculas@...co.com,
	kadlec@...filter.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] netfilter: x_tables: Merge xt_*.h and ipt_*.h
 files which has same name.

> > No, it was your fault in the v5 series of your patches: you managed to
> > send all the patches in a single email instead of separated ones.

Yes, i found that after i replied. I doubt git send-email was used.

> - 1. [PATCH v7 0/3] which is the cover letter, is appering really slowly in
> the list after [PATCH v7 1/3], [PATCH v7 2/3], [PATCH v7 3/3] were arrived.
> This is why I made v7 after v6, because after 10 minutes i still could not
> see that it is successfully arrived in the mailing list, I fustrated about
> it again went wrong.

You obviously did not read the links i gave you. One of them says:

   don’t repost your patches within one 24h period

and there is a later section in the document which explains why.
 
	Andrew