[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e93418d-ef66-42bb-b276-9f92da2596fa@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:26:34 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] arm64/sysreg: Update ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1 to DDI0601
2024-09
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 03:13:24PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 01:02:50AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > -Res0 27:0
> > +UnsignedEnum 27 SF8MM8
> > + 0b0 NI
> > + 0b1 IMP
> > +EndEnum
> > +UnsignedEnum 26 SF8MM4
> > + 0b0 NI
> > + 0b1 IMP
> > +EndEnum
> afaict, bits 27 and 26 are still RES0 in all the documentation I can
> find...
They're in the 2024-09 XML release here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2024-09/AArch64-Registers/ID-AA64SMFR0-EL1--SME-Feature-ID-Register-0?lang=en
which was current at the time the series was sent but I see that they've
been removed in the 2024-12 release which came out later, right at the
end of last year:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2024-12/AArch64-Registers/ID-AA64SMFR0-EL1--SME-Feature-ID-Register-0?lang=en
so we should just remove these. I'll respin (or should I do it
incrementally to save on re-review of the rest of it?).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists