[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8780fa77-d51e-4be8-bdb5-415ddb03482d@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:00:11 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, oder_chiou@...ltek.com
Cc: jack.yu@...ltek.com, shumingf@...ltek.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com,
sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ASoC: rt722-sdca: Add some missing readable
registers
> + case SDW_SDCA_CTL(FUNC_NUM_JACK_CODEC, RT722_SDCA_ENT_USER_FU05,
> + RT722_SDCA_CTL_FU_MUTE, CH_L) ...
> + SDW_SDCA_CTL(FUNC_NUM_JACK_CODEC, RT722_SDCA_ENT_USER_FU05,
> + RT722_SDCA_CTL_FU_MUTE, CH_R):
> + case SDW_SDCA_CTL(FUNC_NUM_JACK_CODEC, RT722_SDCA_ENT_XU0D,
> + RT722_SDCA_CTL_SELECTED_MODE, 0):
nit-pick: maybe we should have a shorter macro when the Channel Number is not used? Using zero here means there is no channel-specific control, not an explicit intent to program ch0 and ignore chN with N>0.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists