linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/156] 6.12.9-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c59a9bf2-efe5-473f-a8c1-c93276df7fc8@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:14:55 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/156] 6.12.9-rc1 review

On 1/6/25 16:18, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 1/6/25 08:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.9 release.
>> There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.9-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
> 
> Compile failed during modpost stage:
> 
>    MODPOST Module.symvers
> ERROR: modpost: "i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "intel_ring_begin" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "shmem_unpin_map" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "intel_gvt_set_ops" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "intel_gvt_clear_ops" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "i915_gem_object_alloc" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "intel_runtime_pm_get" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "i915_gem_object_create_shmem" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "i915_gem_object_pin_map" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "__px_dma" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/kvmgt.ko] undefined!
> 

You can ignore this.
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah