linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] module: Use RCU instead of RCU-sched.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250107084842.GH20870@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 09:48:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] module: Use RCU instead of RCU-sched.

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 06:41:14PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is an updated version of the inital post after PeterZ made me aware
> that there are users outside of the module directory.
> The goal is replace the mix auf rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_sched()
> and preempt_disable() with just rcu_read_lock().
> 
> I've splitted it into smaller chunks which can be applied/ reviewed
> independently. I'm just not sure about the cfi patch (28/28) so I added
> just a comment instead.
> 
> v1…v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241205215102.hRywUW2A@linutronix.de/
>   - Splitted into smaller patches.
>   - Converted all users.

Thanks for doing the cleanup!

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>