[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f089225-9c4a-4510-8b0c-da5ba9812a3d@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 10:35:04 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] media: venus: vdec: Make the range of us_per_frame
explicit
On 06/01/2025 14:40, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Fps bigger than 0.000232829 fps, this fits in a 32 bit us_per_frame.
> There is no need to do a 64 bit division here.
> Also, the driver only works with whole fps.
>
> Found by cocci:
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c:488:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c
> index 6b8906ced6bc..88f6b5a3a4fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int vdec_s_parm(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_streamparm *a)
> struct venus_inst *inst = to_inst(file);
> struct v4l2_captureparm *cap = &a->parm.capture;
> struct v4l2_fract *timeperframe = &cap->timeperframe;
> - u64 us_per_frame, fps;
> + u64 us_per_frame;
>
> if (a->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE &&
> a->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE)
> @@ -486,10 +486,7 @@ static int vdec_s_parm(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_streamparm *a)
> if (!us_per_frame || us_per_frame > USEC_PER_SEC)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - fps = (u64)USEC_PER_SEC;
> - do_div(fps, us_per_frame);
> -
> - inst->fps = fps;
> + inst->fps = USEC_PER_SEC / (u32)us_per_frame;
This still allows for an fps value of USEC_PER_SEC if us_per_frame is 1.
Looking at where inst->fps is used I see:
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c: return mbs * inst->fps;
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c: frate.framerate = inst->fps * (1 << 16);
(mbs is at most 512x512)
So if fps is USEC_PER_SEC those calculations will wrap around.
What is the real maximum fps that the HW can handle?
Stan? Bryan? It would be nice if there is a proper sanity check here.
Regards,
Hans
> timeperframe->numerator = 1;
> timeperframe->denominator = inst->fps;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists