[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90e63cca-4db8-4dde-9d49-10ad26245292@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:54:01 +0200
From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Ricardo Ribalda
<ribalda@...omium.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] media: venus: vdec: Make the range of us_per_frame
explicit
On 1/7/25 11:35 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 06/01/2025 14:40, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>> Fps bigger than 0.000232829 fps, this fits in a 32 bit us_per_frame.
>> There is no need to do a 64 bit division here.
>> Also, the driver only works with whole fps.
>>
>> Found by cocci:
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c:488:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c
>> index 6b8906ced6bc..88f6b5a3a4fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c
>> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int vdec_s_parm(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_streamparm *a)
>> struct venus_inst *inst = to_inst(file);
>> struct v4l2_captureparm *cap = &a->parm.capture;
>> struct v4l2_fract *timeperframe = &cap->timeperframe;
>> - u64 us_per_frame, fps;
>> + u64 us_per_frame;
>>
>> if (a->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE &&
>> a->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE)
>> @@ -486,10 +486,7 @@ static int vdec_s_parm(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_streamparm *a)
>> if (!us_per_frame || us_per_frame > USEC_PER_SEC)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - fps = (u64)USEC_PER_SEC;
>> - do_div(fps, us_per_frame);
>> -
>> - inst->fps = fps;
>> + inst->fps = USEC_PER_SEC / (u32)us_per_frame;
>
> This still allows for an fps value of USEC_PER_SEC if us_per_frame is 1.
>
> Looking at where inst->fps is used I see:
>
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c: return mbs * inst->fps;
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c: frate.framerate = inst->fps * (1 << 16);
>
> (mbs is at most 512x512)
>
> So if fps is USEC_PER_SEC those calculations will wrap around.
>
> What is the real maximum fps that the HW can handle?
>
> Stan? Bryan? It would be nice if there is a proper sanity check here.
It depends on the resolution but I think we could limit the maximum to
240 FPS per instance.
~Stan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists