[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5e61809-ab0f-48f5-9e3c-f5e3e7788237@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:02:37 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
heiko@...ech.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: rockchip-sfc: Add rockchip,fspi
compatible
On 07/01/2025 16:47, Jon Lin wrote:
> FSPI is an SFC upgrade IP that adds functions such as XIP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>
> ---
<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.
Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.
You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.
Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/rockchip-sfc.yaml | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/rockchip-sfc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/rockchip-sfc.yaml
> index ac1503de0478..4d64155d03f8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/rockchip-sfc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/rockchip-sfc.yaml
> @@ -15,11 +15,15 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: rockchip,sfc
> + enum:
> + - rockchip,fspi
Don't grow generic patterns like that. Only SoC specific compatibles.
> + - rockchip,sfc
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists