linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arch/s390: save_area_alloc default failure behavior changed to panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z3/VoAaSQF5Tcy4t@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:56:48 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Weikang Guo <guoweikang.kernel@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/s390: save_area_alloc default failure behavior
 changed to panic

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 04:28:06PM +0800, Weikang Guo wrote:
> > This patch is a follow-up to v7, but instead it needs to be part of v8.
> > I guess Andrew would refresh mm-everything (or whatever he finds appropriate)
> > with the new version.
> 
> Sorry to confuse you, `memblock_alloc_or_panic`  is already merged
> into mm/mm-everything
> by Andrew, so this is an additional patch specifically to fix the
> problem you mentioned.
> 
> This patch is based on the latest mm/mm-everything branch, and it  has
> also been merged
> by  Andrew，You should have received the email.
> 
> @Alexander  I hope I cleared your confusion.  ^ ^

I do not think I am confused. The merged patch is not good enough for s390.
This patch addresses my comments, but it needs to be merged into v7 or re-
posted as v8.

@Andrew, is that still possible?

> > @Andrew, please correct me if I am wroing.
> >
> > Thanks!
> 
> 
> Best regards.
> ---
> Guo

Thanks!