[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b700c13-0e9e-4ea5-bab5-24290babfe94@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:41:06 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik
<josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
CC: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>, "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes
On 09.01.25 16:15, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Here's another set of fixes for the delete path on RAID stripe-tree backed
> filesystems.
>
> Josef's CI system started tripping over a bad key order due to the usage
> of btrfs_set_item_key_safe() in btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent() and
> while investigating what is happening there I found more bugs and not
> handled corner cases, which resulted in more fixes and test-cases.
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't fix the bad key order problem and had to resort
> to re-creating the item in btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent() and insert
> the new one after deleting the old.
>
> Fstests btrfs/06* are extremely good in exhibiting these failures and
> btrfs/060 has been extensively run while developing this series.
>
> A full CI run of v1 can be found here:
> https://github.com/btrfs/linux/actions/runs/12291668397
>
> Changes to v1:
> - Handle extent_map lookup failure in 1/14
> - Don't use key.offset = -1 for initial search in 3/14
> - Don't break before calling btrfs_previous_item if we're on slot 0 in
> 6/14
> - Remove btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty calls
> - Remove line breaks at 80 chars if we're just a bit over
> - Fix multiple issues on comment styling
>
> Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1733989299.git.jth@kernel.org
>
> Note:
> I did not copy the implementation of btrfs_drop_extents() as I'd like to
> have feedback on this variant first, before putting the time and energy in
> a "completely new" implementation.
>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Drop patch "btrfs: fix search when deleting a RAID stripe-extent"
> - Split out setting the incompat flag in the seftests code from patch 1
> - Rework changelog of 2/13
> - Rename the new stripe_extent item to newitem instead of just 'new' in
> 8/13
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-0-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Johannes Thumshirn (14):
> btrfs: selftests: correct RAID stripe-tree feature flag setting
> btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need to
> btrfs: assert RAID stripe-extent length is always greater than 0
> btrfs: fix front delete range calculation for RAID stripe extents
> btrfs: fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents
> btrfs: fix deletion of a range spanning parts two RAID stripe extents
> btrfs: implement hole punching for RAID stripe extents
> btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extents
> btrfs: selftests: check for correct return value of failed lookup
> btrfs: selftests: don't split RAID extents in half
> btrfs: selftests: test RAID stripe-tree deletion spanning two items
> btrfs: selftests: add selftest for punching holes into the RAID stripe extents
> btrfs: selftests: add test for punching a hole into 3 RAID stripe-extents
> btrfs: selftests: add a selftest for deleting two out of three extents
>
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c | 138 ++++++-
> fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c | 660 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 770 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 1f79f5757e9e4944b1c8490b495e8619974d788b
> change-id: 20241218-rst-delete-fixes-f2659047f627
>
> Best regards,
Please ignore v3, I'll send out a v4 tomorrow
Powered by blists - more mailing lists