[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<VI1PR09MB23335F8C46D70921B074488C94132@VI1PR09MB2333.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:13:45 +0000
From: Vladimir Kondratiev <Vladimir.Kondratiev@...ileye.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "anup@...infault.org"
<anup@...infault.org>
CC: "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com"
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add
risc-v,aplic hart indexes
On 07/01/2025 08:58, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
>> Document optional property "riscv,hart-indexes"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>
>> ---
>So you are going to keep ignoring comments?
Not intentionally, sorry for this. I saw your mail too late, after I already posted
"v3". So I asked you how to better handle this. Perhaps this lost somewhere in
the mail thread. I'll repeat - what is the best way, re-submit patch set
as "v4" adding missed address, or re-send "v3"?
Thanks, Vladimir
>NAK, not tested.
>Also:
>Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
>or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>interfere with applying entire sets.
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists