linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add risc-v,aplic hart indexes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20851bad-ae07-4d81-8a98-67458cb11fc6@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:46:04 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Kondratiev <Vladimir.Kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
 "anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
 "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
 <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add
 risc-v,aplic hart indexes

On 09/01/2025 10:13, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> 
> On 07/01/2025 08:58, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
>>> Document optional property "riscv,hart-indexes"
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>
>>> ---
>> So you are going to keep ignoring comments?
> 
> Not intentionally, sorry for this. I saw your mail too late, after I already posted

How?

You sent first version on 2nd of Jan. You got my reply after 6 hours, so
still 2nd of Jan. You even replied to it on 7th of Jan.

This was sent on 9th Jan.

How could you reply to my message before "seeing my mail"?

> "v3". So I asked you how to better handle this. Perhaps this lost somewhere in
> the mail thread. I'll repeat - what is the best way, re-submit patch set
> as "v4" adding missed address, or re-send "v3"?

Whatever submitting patches is proposing for your specific case. Resend
is for patches without any changes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof